Profound Truth Exposed
Your Ultimate Source For Biblical Truth
HE IS YEHOVAH
Proverbs 18:13 "He who gives an answer before he hears, It is folly and shame to him."
The battle between evolution and creation has been going on for quite sometime. Many people think Charles Darwin is the inventor of the theory of evolution, but truthfully the theory goes far beyond Darwin's day. Darwin actually got most of his material from his grandfather Erasmus Darwin (12 December 1731 – 18 April 1802) was an English physician. One of the key thinkers of the Midlands Enlightenment, he was also a natural philosopher, physiologist, slave-trade abolitionist, inventor and poet. His poems included much natural history, including a statement of evolution and the relatedness of all forms of life.
Although the idea of life evolving from simple creatures to complex organism wasn't started by these two men, they did succeed at making it the popular notion it has become today.
Charles Darwin
Erasmus Darwin
Darwin published his theory of evolution with compelling evidence in his 1859 book "On the Origin of Species", overcoming scientific rejection of earlier concepts of transmutation of species. By the 1870's, the scientific community and much of the general public had accepted evolution as a fact. However, many favored competing explanations and it was not until the emergence of the modern evolutionary synthesis from the 1930's to the 1950's. From that a broad consensus developed in which natural selection was the basic mechanism of evolution. In modified form, Darwin's scientific discovery is the unifying theory of the life sciences, explaining the diversity of life.
Darwin's early interest in nature led him to neglect his medical education at the University of Edinburgh; instead, he helped to investigate marine invertebrates. Studies at the University of Cambridge encouraged his passion for natural science. His five-year voyage on HMS Beagle established him as an eminent geologist whose observations and theories supported Charles Lyell's uniformitarian ideas, and publication of his journal of the voyage made him famous as a popular author. On his voyage, Charles Darwin stopped off at the Galapagos Islands. He observed several finches; all with different beak sizes. From this observation Darwin concluded that they must have evolved to fit their environment over time. Now this deception is so effective because it does have some truth to it. In the Book of Genesis, Yehovah said He made every animal after its kind. There is something called microevolution, where there are variation within kinds of animals.
Genesis 1:25
Yehovah made the beasts of the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their kind, and everything that creeps on the ground after its kind; and Yehovah saw that it was good.
Many people assume that when Yehovah created the animals that He made every single species we see today. But, is that what the Scriptures is saying. It only says Yehovah created them after their kind. This would mean that animals have variations which would allow for different types of the same kind of animal to have a wide variety of species within a kind. For example, man has bred the wolf into all the types or "kinds" of dogs you see today; but they are all still dogs. None of them evolved the DNA to create each kind of dog we have are in the original wolf breed. Their variations are far more drastic than the beaks of those finches. We have never once seen or witnessed one kind of animal giving birth to another kind of animal. Which is called macroevolution, meaning mutations in a kind, changing the DNA of an animal to another kind of animal. Evolution truly takes just as much, if not more faith than believing in creation.
Science is something we can observe, test and repeat. Can we use the scientific method with the theory of evolution? No! We cannot prove that one singled cell organism became everything we see today by random chances over millions of years. How about Yehovah's theory of "created everything after its kind?" Yes we can! All the animals we observe today only bring forth after the type or kind of animal it is. This is what they claim happened: life came from something not living, came alive then changed into a male and female somehow by chance. After it changed its DNA over time from one singled cell organism into a human which has over many trillions of cells. All this with no evidence of it ever being witnessed in science!
Now let's show some errors evolution doesn't tell you about.
They say the big bang was a very small spinning dot that eventually exploded into everything we have today. Now let's use something called angular momentum. That is the scientific method that says if something is spinning and objects are thrown off it; the objects will be spinning in the same direction as the original rotation. So knowing that, everything in our solar system should be spinning in the same direction right? Not so, two planets and six moons in our solar system are spinning in the opposite direction than the others, many galaxies also. Venus and Uranus spin backwards. You can look up which moons in your own research. There are many scientific methods that prove evolution is not true and the earth is closer to six thousand years old like the Scriptures say, not 4.5 Billion years
Diamond is the hardest substance known, so its interior should be very resistant to contamination. Diamond requires very high pressure to form pressure found naturally on earth only deep below the surface. Thus they probably formed at a depth of 100–200 km. Geologists believe that the ones we find must have been transported supersonically to the surface, in extremely violent eruptions through volcanic pipes. Some are found in these pipes, such as kimberlites, while other diamonds were liberated by water erosion and deposited elsewhere (called alluvial diamonds). According to evolutionists, the diamonds formed about 1–3 billion years ago.
Geophysicist Dr. John Baumgardner, part of the RATE research group, investigated 14C in a number of diamonds. There should be no 14C at all if they really were over a billion years old because C14 has a halflife of 5,730. After 5,730 there should be none left to measure, yet the radiocarbon lab reported that there was over 10 times the detection limit. Thus they had a radiocarbon ‘age’ far less than a million years! Dr. Baumgardner repeated this with six more alluvial diamonds from Namibia, and these had even more radiocarbon.
According to astronomical observations, galaxies like our own experience about one supernova (a violently-exploding star) every 25 years. The gas and dust remnants from such explosions (like the Crab Nebula) expand outward rapidly and should remain visible for over a million years. Yet the nearby parts of our galaxy in which we could observe such gas and dust shells contain only about 200 supernova remnants. That number is consistent with only about 7,000 year's worth of supernovas.
According to evolutionary theory, comets are supposed to be the same age as the universe, about 15 billion years. Yet each time a comet in our solar system orbits close to the sun, it loses so much of its material that it could not survive much longer than about 100,000 years. Many comets have typical ages of less than 10,000 years. Evolutionists explain this discrepancy by assuming that comets come from an unobserved spherical "Oort cloud" well beyond the orbit of Pluto, improbable gravitational interactions with infrequently passing stars often knock comets into the solar system, and other improbable interactions with planets slow down the incoming comets often enough to account for the hundreds of comets observed. So far, none of these assumptions has been substantiated either by observations or realistic calculations. Lately, there has been much talk of the "Kuiper Belt," a disc of supposed comet sources lying in the plane of the solar system just outside the orbit of Pluto. Some asteroid-sized bodies of ice exist in that location, but they do not solve the evolutionists' problem, since according to evolutionary theory, the Kuiper Belt would quickly become exhausted if there were no Oort cloud to supply it, yet no one has ever seen this Oort cloud to verify its existence.
Each year, water and winds erode about 20 billion tons of dirt and rock from the continents and deposit it in the ocean. This material accumulates as loose sediment on the hard basaltic (lava-formed) rock of the ocean floor. The average depth of all the sediment in the whole ocean is less than 400 meters. The main way known to remove the sediment from the ocean floor is by plate tectonic subduction. That is, sea floor slides slowly (a few cm/year) beneath the continents, taking some sediment with it. According to secular scientific literature, that process presently removes only 1 billion tons per year. As far as anyone knows, the other 19 billion tons per year simply accumulate. At that rate, erosion would deposit the present mass of sediment in less than 12 million years. Yet according to evolutionary theory, erosion and plate subduction have been going on as long as the oceans have existed, an alleged three billion years. If that were so, the rates above imply that the oceans would be massively choked with sediment dozens of kilometers deep. An alternative (creationist) explanation is that erosion from the waters of the Genesis flood running off the continents deposited the present amount of sediment within a short time about 5,000 years ago.
Natural radioactivity, mutations, and decay degrade DNA and other biological material rapidly. Measurements of the mutation rate of mitochondrial DNA recently forced researchers to revise the age of "mitochondrial Eve" from a theorized 200,000 years down to possibly as low as 6,000 years. DNA experts insist that DNA cannot exist in natural environments longer than 10,000 years, yet intact strands of DNA appear to have been recovered from fossils allegedly much older: Neanderthal bones, insects in amber, and even from dinosaur fossils. Bacteria allegedly 250 million years old apparently have been revived with no DNA damage. Soft tissue and blood cells from a dinosaur have astonished experts.
Although we cannot see Yehovah, by His creation we know there is a creator.
There is no such thing as a simple organism. In Darwin’s day, microscopes were very primitive. If he could see what we now see today; even he would have to acknowledge how absurd the idea is. We have trillions of cells in our body. They now know one cell is more complex than New York City at rush hour, and that’s not just the traffic. It’s every building, street, light, sewer, subway systems and even the cables inside the buildings, everything! DNA is simply information. Blueprints have information in it. If you set blueprints on the floor, on how to build a space shuttle how long do you think it would take the information on the floor to evolve into a space shuttle by itself? So what are the chances all this came up by random chance with no intelligence? Would you expect all this to make itself randomly without intelligence? How much more complex are we?
Bill Nye
Now Mr. Ham and his followers have this remarkable view of a worldwide flood, that somehow influenced everything we observe in nature. A 500 foot wooden boat, eight zookeepers for 14,000 individual animals, every land plant in the world underwater for a year? I ask us all, "is that really reasonable?".
Hugh Ross
Acceptance of old-earth ideas, including the Big Bang, progressive creation, theistic evolution, the framework hypothesis, etc., necessarily implies downgrading the Flood of Noah's day from worldwide in scope to merely one of local extent. For example, Dr. Hugh Ross (an aggressive advocate of billions of years for the earth's age) vigorously denies the global flood.
Lee Woofenden
Of course it didn’t happen. The Noah story is myth, not history. It originated in a pre-scientific age. People in those days didn’t think the same way we do today. They probably look at you funny, as if you’d asked a strange and irrelevant question.
Basically in the last days people will be ignorant of Biblical claims and that the world was destroyed by a worldwide flood. They will be deceived by so called modern intelligence. What is really happening is people want to do their own passions without having to answer to a Creator or God. So they choose to come up with a way of doing away with any possibility of one existing. The Scriptures say all those who do not accept the truth will believe a lie. I believe this lie in the end times is the theory of evolution. This world shows the proof of design everywhere if you stop and look.
The reason why evolutionist will not and cannot accept a worldwide flood is if you accept a real global flood, then you destroy evolution's millions of years of history. As it is supposedly recorded in the fossils found in the layers of rock. You see, the eroding of these layers by the Flood-and then the "re-depositing" of the sediments and the destroying of many of the fossils-would eliminate much of this "evidence" of these alleged millions of years. It's an important point. Also it's important for atheist to hold fast to evolution, because it's the only other option besides creation.
Professor Richard Lewontin
It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but, on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priority adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counter-intuitive, no matter how mystifying to the uninitiated. Moreover, that materialism is an absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door.”
Rapid or no erosion between strata
We find evidence of rapid erosion, or even of no erosion, between rock layers. Flat, knife-edge boundaries between rock layers indicate continuous deposition of one layer after another, with no time for erosion. For example, there is no evidence of any “missing” millions of years (of erosion) in the flat boundary between two well-known layers of Grand Canyon, the Coconino Sandstone and the Hermit Formation. Another impressive example of flat boundaries at Grand Canyon is the Redwall Limestone and the strata beneath it.
Polystrate Fossils
Tree trunk fossils are frequently found cutting across many geological layers—hence the name polystrate fossils (poly = many; stratum = layer). It is not possible that polystrate fossils were buried gradually over many thousands or hundreds of thousands of years because the top part of any tree would have rotted away before it could be protected by sediment. Polystrate fossils point to rapid burial and are evidence for the reality of the global Flood recorded in the Bible.
John D. Morris, Ph.D.
A better interpretation of past deposits would stem from acceptance of rapid intense geologic processes, such as Noah's Flood.
Evidence for a worldwide flood.
Many people doubt the worldwide flood account in the book of Genesis. What if we simply review the possibility of this actually being true in the Word of Yehovah. If this is a fact, we should easily be able to see evidence all over the world of this physical evidence.
People can believe things came about by evolution if they choose to, but scientifically it is highly improbable; that all of this came about by random chances over millions of years. The Bible says in the beginning Yehovah created the heavens and the earth in six days. Evolutionary scientists say it was created over billions of years by the big bang. No one ever stops to think is that science or faith also. By the 2nd law of thermodynamics, matter cannot be eternal. So where did the matter come from that caused the big bang; it must have been created, so there needed to be a Creator. Science is something you can observe, test and repeat in a laboratory, its observational science. Historical science is impossible to observe because no man was present to see it take place. So creationist and evolutionist are looking at the same material with two different conclusions but both are faith based. Creationist have faith, in the beginning Elohim (God) created which is why we see so many creations and variations. Evolutionist have faith, in the beginning something exploded and created everything.
If you are an evolutionist reading this, I urge you to look at the other side of the coin before committiing yourself to one or the other. In a court of law, both sides get to display and argue their case. It's only fair to weigh both sides and come to a verdict beyond a reasonable doubt.
One of the biggest mysteries is how do dinosaurs fit into to this creation, since they are supposed to have been millions of years old? Well, what if it wasn't millions of years after all.
First off, let’s explain that the word dinosaur is a relatively new creation. The phrase was created in the year 1842. Before that they were called dragons. There are also many artifacts that depict dinosaur’s much older than the occupation of paleontology. Many different cultures showed dinosaurs and man living together. Even dinosaur tracks stepping into human tracks. A flood buried the dinosaur’s that’s how fossils form. Animals are dying today and none are being fossilized. Cover them with mud, cut off the oxygen supply and you will get a fully intact fossil.
Steggasaurus Carving on a Buddhist temple.
Ta Prohm is the modern name for a temple at Angkor, Cambodia. It was built in the late 1100's and early 1400's as a Buddhist monastery. Originally called Rajavihara, it was among many other Buddhist and Hindu temples produced by the Khmer civilization from the eighth through the fourteenth century A.D. The temple was commissioned by self-proclaimed "god-king" Jayavarman VII, one of the most renowned monarchs and builders of the empire.
Evolutionist will of course try and explain away how and when this got there.
Fossilized dinosaur foot print stepping inside a human foot print. In order for the dino track to step inside of an obvious human foot print, the human must have stepped first then the dinosaur comes along and steps in its place. If man and dinosaur never existed together, how could this even take place. Scientific studies have been done on many human and dino tracks that appear together. These studies use scientic methods to prove it is not fake by the texture and pressure within these solid stone formations. Fakes would be very easy to expose, but yet the facts remains the scientific observation says they are authentic and there are many that have recently been found.
Beginning in the 1930's, the father of Dr. Javier Cabrera, Cultural Anthropologist for Ica, Peru, discovered many hundreds of ceremonial burial stones in the tombs of the ancient Incas. Dr. Cabrera carrying on his father’s work, has collected more than 1,100 of these andesite stones, which are estimated to be between 500 and 1,500 years old and have become known collectively as the Ica Stones. The stones bear etchings, many of which are sexually graphic (which was common to the culture). Some picture idols and others depict such practices as open-heart surgery and brain transplants. The most astonishing etchings, however, clearly represent dinosaurs, brontosaurs, and triceratops.
Does the world have dragon legends by famous historians?
During the period of time when Alexander The Great and his army were invading India, it was written in Alexander's memoirs that his soldiers encountered a dragon kept in a cave which hissed frightfully and was over 100 feet long. Alexander even said that his soldiers were so terrified of the dragons that they encountered that they simply left them alone. Why did Alexander say this? Not everything said by a person who lived centuries ago is false. In fact, the people of India allegedly even begged Alexander and his army to NOT harm the dragons that they encountered because the people of India back then revered dragons as gods (and many of the people of India still do). Alexander The Great lived from 356 BC to 323 BC. So were there dragons living in India (and throughout the rest of this planet in general) during that period of time? The Greek sophist Flavius Philostratus approximately lived merely four centuries after Alexander The Great had died. The year of birth of Flavius Philostratus is estimated to be around 172 AD while the year of death of Flavius Philostratus is estimated to be around 250 AD. In his book "The Life Of Apollonius Of Tyana" Flavius Philostratus provides this detailed account of dragons living in India.
Herodotus, respected Greek historian who lived in approximately 450 BC, once wrote:
There is a place in Arabia...to which I went, on hearing of some winged serpents; and when I arrived there, I saw bones and spines of serpents, in such quantities as it would be impossible to describe. The form of the serpent is like that of a water-snake; but he has wings without feathers, and as like as possible to the wings of a bat. Herodotus recognized that such creatures were not birds, mammals, or insects but reptiles with wings in the first-century AD.
Jewish historian Josephus wrote about Moses and the Israelites having a difficult time passing through a particular region because of the presence of flying reptiles.
The ground was difficult to be passed over, because of the multitude of serpents (which it produces in vast numbers).
Some of which ascend out of the ground unseen, and also fly in the air, and do come upon men at unawares, and do them a mischief.
Marco Polo traveling from 1271-1291 AD, wrote in his journal
"Here are found snakes and huge serpents, ten paces in length and ten spans in girth (meaning 50 ft. long and 100 inch circumference). At the fore part, near the head, they have two short legs, each with three claws, as well as eyes larger than a loaf and very glaring. The jaws are wide enough to swallow a man, the teeth are large and sharp, and their whole appearance is so formidable that neither man, nor any kind of animal can approach them without terror. Others are of smaller size, being eight, six, or five paces long."
The Henham dragon is the popular name for a large serpent-like creature (dragon) sighted near Henham, Essex, England in 1669. Henham or Henham-on-the-Hill is a small village with a current population of about 1250. It is located in the north-west part of Essex about seven miles south of the historical town of Saffron Walden where a flying reptile called a cocatrice was killed around the same time.The pamphlet was circulated in 1669 in Essex, England regarding the recent sightings of a large reptile. Although seen by numerous people, attempts by local villagers to shoot the beast were unsuccessful.
Clearly people wrote about giant reptiles called dragons in the past, although we now know them as the term dinosaurs, they existed with man not millions of years ago. Through excessive hunting man killed of these large beast which are now, as far as we know mainly extinct except for the Comodo dragons, crocodile, and alligators. Which aren't as big as the fossils we find, but still pretty large reptiles. Another reason is given why the very large dinosaurs are not around. After the flood, there seems to have been a change in the atmosphere causing the oxygen levels to become much lower than we have today. This effect would bring about a problem for the largest dinosaurs because their nostrils were relatively small, about the size of a horse. This would become a problem because the dinosaurs would not be able to take a large enough breathe to fill their lungs and they would suffocate.
The recent extraction by scientists, of ancient DNA from organisms entombed in amber much like in the science-fiction novel and movie, Jurassic Park is an example of why scientists are intensely interested in amber. Minute bubbles of ancient air trapped by successive flows of tree resin during the life of the tree are preserved in the amber. Analysis of the gases in these bubbles, show that the earth's atmosphere found in these air bubbles scientist believe to be when the dinosaurs roamed the earth. Which contained nearly 35 percent more oxygen compared to present levels of 21 percent. Results are based upon more than 300 analysis by USGS scientists of Cretaceous, Tertiary, and recent-age amber from 16 world sites. The oldest amber in this study is about 130 million years old by evolutionary timescales, but of course this is their worldview not based on true facts in science.
Errors in the dating methods evolutionists won't tell you about!
Does the Bible speak about dinosaurs?
Although the term dinosaur is not in the Bible, the phrase "dragon" can be found in many places. But there is another animal God describes to Job that fits the description of what we would know as a dinosaur.
Job 40:15-19
Behold now behemoth, which I made with the; he eats grass as an ox.
His strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly.
He moves his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his thighs are wrapped together. His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron. He is the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach unto him.
Many theologians will interpret this as being a elephant or hippo. A cedar tree, which is described as how this massive creation of Yehovah moves his tail; Cedrus libani (Cedar Tree) is an evergreen coniferous tree growing up to 40m (130 ft) tall, with a trunk up to 2.5m (8 ft 2 in) in diameter.
Now let's assume Yehovah doesn't need to exaggerate. Do either of these tails look like an cedar tree?
Evolutionist will always hold onto their theory if they aren't willing to accept a creator of this world. All we can do is look at the evidence and make an informed decision. But make no mistake about it, both of these theories (Creation & Evolution) are faith base religions. You can't prove either one or the other with hard science. Yehovah wants us to believe without seeing, why?
Well think of it like this assuming you believe in Elohim (God). Satan was able to stand in the very courts of Yehovah Almighty, seeing Him face to face. Satan, then known as Lucifer, still decided to disobey Yehovah and rebel against Him. Because of that rebellion, sin entered into the universe and brought about all the suffering we see today. Perhaps the reason Yehovah doesn't want to be seen visually is because that doesn't guarantee that His people will obey Him. Maybe to Him, if He appears to be apart from His creation, He can truly see the actions of man when they believe He is not able to see them. When the authority is taken out of the room, the people within the room will tend to get comfortable and show who they truly are over time. Although Yehovah is not far from us ever, He cannot be physically next to us because He is a consuming fire for sin. If we are continually living in sin, His presence alone will consume us. He does not wish that any of us perish, but all come to repentance by faith in His Son, and dying to sin in our lives. Yehovah did leave us His Word to study and get to know His character. If we can love, obey, and follow the Creator here and now without physically seeing Him, He can save us from Sin and death. Trusting that we will follow Him and obey for eternity believing that He knows what is best for us. Besides, after making it through this world full of death, hate, sickness, fighting, anger, corruption and suffering would you ever want to even think of coming back to this experiment of sin? Definitely not! By His creation we know He is the Creator.
This world shows the proof of design everywhere if you stop and look.
Example 1: If you’re walking in the forest and see a pile of five rocks standing on top of each other you wouldn’t expect that they evolved to stack up one on top of another. Of course, logically you would think to yourself someone was here and decided to put them on top of each other. Humans are vastly more complex than rocks. See the simplicity in this concept, information comes from a mind and minds create creations and creations come from a creator.
Example 2: If you walk in the dessert and see a broken down motorcycle, you don’t assume the bike evolved from the sand by itself. You know by its design; there is a motorcycle factory somewhere that used intelligence to build it.
Example 3: Imagine walking into an empty room with only one painting on the wall. You’re absolutely positive that painting was created by the mind and talent of a painter; but we don’t apply that type of thinking to the world and all the creations we see.
The dangers of teaching evolution is that, you're made to believe that you're just like any other animal just more evolved. Being an animal means life is essentially pointless. You live then you die, but Yehovah says you were made in His image and meant to live with a purpose and live forever. Many elite rulers have used this satanic idea of evolution to bring about Communism in their country. Adolf Hitler used it in Germany before he was involved in WW2. This idea, your just an animal makes it easier for you to want kill those who are so called "not as evolved as you" but in fact we are all the same just a different shade and variation of human being, which is why we can all bring forth after our kind as Yehovah said. I will do some more explaining on this type of deception in the tab relating to "Deceptions".
The problem most people have is that they cannot physically see Yehovah (God). Try and think of it like this, the computer was created by intelligence right? Does the creator of the computer actually live inside or outside of the computer?
Many simply believe because you aren't able to visually see something, it doean't exist. If we use that logic then WIFI doesn't exist either. Can you tell me what color WIFI is, or what it truly looks like? All we know is the effects WIFI has on the mechanisms it interacts with. An many around the world have been changed by the God of the Bible.
Although we cannot physically see Yehovah, we can see His creations all around us. If I say to you, Mount Rushmore is millions of years old, created by many years of erosion from wind and rain carving these images into the side of this mountain and this was all done by random chance, with no intelligence involved. Would you believe me? Obviously not because it's not logical. So what are the chances the real George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt and Thomas Jefferson came about by random chance over millions of years? Humans are vastly more complex than rocks on the side of a mountain. Creation has logical answers to life, but it will take faith also. Evolution has its own interpretations also but takes just as much faith if not more to believe. I hope this helps you want to seek out more secrets locked in creation.
